Yuku free message boards

Message 1
From: spiritrebel23 (Original Message) Sent: 7/28/2006 3:56 AM

Here are the pictures themselves and Colette's original captions for 'em:

The "Entity" is the white image that looks like a statue, below the right corner of the tin roof on the shed.

This photo was taken just a few minutes before the other one, and clearly shows that there was nothing that looked anything like the "Entity" in front of the shed at that time.

Message 3
From: freshlillis Sent: 7/28/2006 2:55 PM

Very interesting Colette- it looks like a little ghost or an ET hanging around in your beautiful yard- do spooky things happen around your house?- fresh

Message 5
From: spiritrebel23 Sent: 7/28/2006 5:51 PM

Well, all that I can say at this point is that Colette's "Entity Pic" is one of the most impressive examples of its type that I've ever seen. Over the months that the pic has been in my possession, I've done extensive enlargement and analysis on it myself, and I am completely convinced, from the visible evidence alone, that I isn't either a fake or any kind of double exposure or "trick of light". In other words, even if it hadn't been taken by someone I know and trust, I'd still tend to conclude that "there's something truly unexplainable in this picture".

First of all the object is not just a statue seen from a funny angle, or anything like that -- it's clearly not in contact with the ground. And the pattern of shadows on the surface show that it's definitely a three-dimensional object. However, it isn't solid enough to be a "prop" of some kind suspended on wires -- the background peeks through it several places. And any kind of double-exposure or trick photography is ruled out because the entity image is clearly behind some of the branches in the foreground. So my conclusion is that it's at least semi-solid, but that it's not an "ordinary material object" of any kind either.

I'm not going to engage in speculations about "ghosts vs ETs". My own opinion on these matters is that these are two of many possible names for a single, very real phenomenon. And as for the "physical/non-physical" debate, my Spirit Guides have told me repeatedly that earthly science simply doesn't know about the true nature of matter, energy, and time to give me the background knowledge to truly understand such things.

Message 7
From: freshlillis Sent: 7/28/2006 8:35 PM

It probably scared the dickens out of him- It looks so real- can you blow it up more where its at Spiritrebel? its very enticing- Gracehopper isnt her property beautiful? I could lay out there all day- Fresh

Message 9
From: spiritrebel23 Sent: 7/29/2006 9:29 AM

Fresh, #7:

Well, I could post an enlarged version of the "entity" itself here in this thread, but I'm reluctant to do that kind of thing, because readers of any group such such wide variety of browser software that no matter what form I post graphics in, many people are going to want to save the pic and format it so they can see it best.

So my policy is just to post a pic in the original form I received it in and let others do their own enlargements, etc. In other words, if I did post an enlargement, I'm not sure how big to make the entity to look best on your screen. And even if you found a version I posted to be ideal for you, it would still probably be too small or so big a lot of detail was lost to someone else.

Anyway, Fresh, what I recommend is that you have one of your dirtside friends teach you how to enlarge pics on your own computer. It's something that's very difficult to do on line, and not a skill I have myself anymore. I could do this kind of thing back in the 80's and 90's, but those skills are obsolete now, and I don't have time or energy in my old age to learn new ones. I actually depend quite a bit on dirtside friends here just to teach me what I need to know to use my own hardware and software -- they answer my questions as I ask them, and help solve any glitches that I run into. And this is about all I can recommend to you or anyone else at this point...

Message 12
From: spiritrebel23 Sent: 7/29/2006 1:06 PM

I just went to PT and looked for the thread where Colette posted the entity pic there, but didn't find it. I suspect it did get deleted, but if it's still there, maybe she can find it and give me the name. If I can find the enlargement, I can easily bring it over here and post it. It's just that I don't think this is a real solution to the over-all problem. People need to know how to download and enlarge pics on their computer -- that's the only way they can be sure of getting what's right for their eyes and their particular computer setup.

If Colette can't find the enlargement on PT, I'll make one on my own and post it in this thread. But I wait till I hear from her on that...

Message 22
From: muutherr80 Sent: 7/30/2006 4:19 PM

boy the enlargement is freaky. Like i said i love the land and the little house nestled in the foothill but now a visit from me is out of the question! ahahah

I wonder what this creature would classify as. Et's are not my thing really as far as experience but i love the thought of other worlds and i do believe it would be awfully arrogant not to believe of other life out there. I know for a fact that i dont want to meet one and especially not at my back door. I would need a full time cardiologist on site!

I just am still in wonderment of this picture and i cant help trying to figure ever logical thing it could be. But on the flip of that i do believe its some kind of thing that may have come thru some kind of portal or dimensional opening......??

in other words...ITS COOL STUFF! hahaha

muutherr believes!

Message 26
From: Colette3652 Sent: 8/22/2006 7:27 PM

I think folk cannot actually believe this anymore than I hardly can myself. It was taken by Himself who saw absolutely nothing and who detests anything paranormal. He doesn't like even looking at it. But as I said it has been examined by a forensic photographic analyst and found to be a genuine anomaly.

Although as I have said he feels because of the fuzzing in the pre-entity photo that it is a ghost rather than a space being.

Message 38
From: Colette3652 Sent: 8/30/2006 1:00 PM

After the forensic photographer pronounced it to be a genuine anomaly I sent this photo to Bruce Maccabbee who said if it was not a statue in the garden [which it is not] he considered because of the fogging in the first photo that it was paranormal rather than ufo and out of his field of interest. From the shed to the wooden gate is approx 35 metres and in front of the shed are two vegie patches the entity appeared to be at the shed end of these near the last runner bean support. As I say nothing at all was actually seen.

Message 43
From: Colette3652 Sent: 12/2/2006 2:27 AM

The ufo investigator got back to me last week with an old photo of an alien in Alaska that closely resembled mine. It was taken possibly in the thirties and is black and white and grainy. I will see if I can isolate it.